Management Researcher is the research publication of Institute of Management Development and Research which successfully completed two decades in research publication. It is a double blind peer reviewed journal which agrees upon standards of ethical behaviour for all stakeholders involved in the publishing i.e. the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. The ethics statements are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practices Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Management Researcher, which was started in 1994, ensures that reviews are conducted in an objective manner. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers are instructed to express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The journal abides by the best practices in publication. The Chief Editor and the Associate Editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's Editorial Board and subjected to such legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
It also assures equity and excellence in publication. Opportunity is given to all authors in commerce and management areas to get it published in our journal. The manuscripts are evaluated solely on their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The ethical policy of the journal ensures the confidentiality of the manuscript. The Chief Editor, the Associate Editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.
The Management Researcher also ensures that proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors are instructed to cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. It also ensures that authors have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this must be appropriately cited or quoted. If an author discovers an important mistake in the published work, the author is required to inform the journal editor in order to either correct or withdraw the paper.
Management Researcher articulates a critical analysis of a manuscript in their specialty by the peer reviewers. All pre reviewers are instructed to provide honest, constructive, careful, justified and positive feedback to the authors. The policy is not to criticize, but to enhance the quality of the research work. The peer reviewer in the respective area of specialisation is instructed to pinpoint the strengths and weaknesses of the article and the areas that could be improved.
Management Researcher being the guardian of the high quality research, always expects the peer reviewers to ensure the trustworthiness and confidentiality of the articles being reviewed by them. This silver jubilee publication always keeps improving the quality of the paper published in our journal, thus increasing the research quality besides enhancing the rating among the publishers
Management Researcher has a transparent policy in reviewing articles received for publication. A double blind peer review process is applicable for our journal and the author is informed about the status of their contribution whether accepted or sent back to them for improvements
As a first step there is an initial screening done in order to check the paper’s theme. Then the paper is reviewed by the Subject Expert and the Editorial Review Members. The journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process. Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the Chief Editor decides whether a paper can be accepted or accepted subject to change. If it is found totally unacceptable the article will be rejected.
For papers which have been suggested to modify, the same reviewers will be assessing the resubmitted paper in order to ensure the suggestions are accepted and the paper is revised.
If the paper is accepted by the reviewers, author(s) will be informed by acceptance letter. Author/Corresponding Author will be informed about the possible date of publication.
The entire process takes a maximum of 1-2 months
Management Researcher has instructed the peer reviewer as to how the matter may be reviewed and prepares a report on the following line. He/ She should note down all the points in a collative manner and submit the same to the Chief Editor.
1 | Article Type | (Original article, review article, case study, editorial review etc.,) |
2 | Word Count | Whether the article meets / exceeds or recedes the word count specification of the journal. If not met, whether the author(s) is suggested to increase/decrease the word count? |
3 | Title | Whether the title correctly conveys the essence of the paper and meeting the title word count requirements |
4 | Abstract | Whether the abstract is complete and summarizes the entire paper within the said word count |
5 | Keywords | Whether the author(s) provided minimum to maximum number of keywords |
6 | Introduction | Whether it conveys the background, setting, purpose and objective of the research |
7 | Literature review | Whether it is precise, informative, cites only recent articles (not less than five years), presents the research gap and properly developed |
8 | Methodology / Materials and Methods | Whether listed out each and every component with justification? |
9 | Results | Whether the research results are properly tabulated and illustrated through graphs with correct calculations |
10 | Conclusion/Discussion | Whether the manuscript answers the research question(s) and concludes it properly with proper justification |
11 | Limitations / Recommendations | Whether the study limitations are provided with recommendations for future studies |
12 | Tables, Figures, Images | Whether all the tables, figures, images are properly cited with source, cited in-text, cited with permission etc., |
13 | Plagiarism | Whether the content is plagiarism-free or the plagiarism is within the limits. |
14 | Conflict of interest | Whether the authors have no conflict of interest |
15 | Contribution of authors | Whether the authors’ contributions are present with required information (for example, author x provided concept, author y collected data and author z helped in data analysis (or) all the authors contributed equally) |
16 | Acknowledgement and study sponsors | Whether the authors have acknowledged or cited the study sponsors |
17 | Comments suitable for transmission to the authors | Whether the comments provided inside the paper are clear, suitable and justified |
18 | Language | Whether the manuscript needed language editing |
19 | Supplementary Materials | Whether the author need to submit the supplementary materials (such as interview transcripts or data in excel sheet or permission requests) if any during resubmission |
20 | Reference/ Bibliography | Whether the author has followed correct method in preparing the reference/bibliography |
Form IV (See Rule 8)
1 | Place of Publication | Trivandrum, Kerala |
2 | Frequency of Publication | Quarterly |
3 | Printer’s Name and Address | Navadhara Printers, Sreekaryam , Trivandrum - 695 017. |
4 | Editor’s Name and Address | Dr. C V Jayamani, TC 8/123, Pooja, Kavil Lane, Cheruvakkal, Sreekaryam, Trivanrum - 695 017. |
5 | Ownership | Institute of Management Development and Research (IMDR), Trivandrum. Convent Road, Trivandrum 695 001. |
I, Prof. M. Sivaraman, hereby declare that the particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(Sd/-)
Prof. M. Sivaraman,
Publisher
The fee for scrutiny is fixed at 2500 for each article. One year subscription is complimentary to this amount.